Watch Live Choice2012
The Vice Presidential Candidates debate. Gary Johnson (Libertarian ) , Jill Stien (Green Party), Rocky Anderson ( Justice Party) ,and Virgil Goode ( Constitutional party).
Showing posts with label Choice2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Choice2012. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Monday, October 22, 2012
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
[Watch) Live Presidential Town Hall Debate
Watch LIVE
The 2nd Presidential Candidates debate
The 2nd Presidential Candidates debate
Labels:
Choice2012,
livestreams
Thursday, October 11, 2012
The Vice Presidential candidates debate
LIVE
Choice2012
Watch the Vice-Presidential candidates live
Choice2012
Watch the Vice-Presidential candidates live
Labels:
Choice2012,
livestreams
Wednesday, October 03, 2012
Saturday, September 15, 2012
The What if.... Campaign
Opinion
By Mark T , guest writing for Croglog
email us mychiller@inbox.com
The Political Season , has it's conventions and the debates are about to start we've had this long period of candidates attacking and promising. We suffer under the political ads that torture on TV, Radio and internet. We make the joke that politicians lie , and that they probably do.
What if a politician ran a campaign differently ? How ? You may be asking. Many campaigns are built on promises , " When ( Very confident) I am elected president i will ....(insert something here)". 3 things usually happen if that person wins , a. they work on the promise, b, they forget about it c, they try it and it fails. Most of the time B happens the most. Let's say I would do it more like this "When you elect me your President I will work hard on trying to get ... (insert something here) , it may not happen but there's nothing wrong with trying." It's the truth that sometimes a promise by a president can fall short, yet still showing positivity for something that may not happen.
Campaigns get dirty . We are used to these attack ads on TV where the deep voice says for example " This Candidate caused the great tuna disaster when they were governor of tuna ( this is just an example people) would you vote for this person because he caused thousands of people to be injured by defective cans?" Attacking the other candidate is what always happens , dig up their past try to relate it to the future. " This Governor caused his state to have a deficit think what he will do to the country" That kind of thing , trying to make you think "Hey, if he can't run a state how can he run a country?" Most cases attacks are the candidate wanting you to like them more than the other person. What they are really saying is " I told my dear mother when I was 8 , I want to be president of the United States. I should be the President" That would probably be the honest thing to say. Attacking the other candidate is really like other adverting. " Joe's Fords has more Fords at better prices than Jim's Fords". They both are selling Fords but Joe's wants you to come to them and makes Jim's not look that good. Human Emotion is what you play with. What if , campaign has not figured out away to get rid of attacks , many candidates have tried to play the positive person , but at many a time they have to go negative. But a nice way to be negative : "I might like the other candidate they seem very nice , but if they were president they might cause (insert something bad here) ." See an honest opinion but still kind of negative.
Endorse me ,would you? Let's say there was a candidate let's him Ed , he's running for President , and for now he's going through a primary in his party, then there's a former president (ooh lucky) , named John (they don't have last names) he is well loved by his party and voters in that party. That's great! So maybe Ed thinks that if he got John's endorsement it would help in his party. It's like a famous person endorsing a credit card ( since when to famous people use credit cards?). The company thinks "Hey, we got this big celebrity endorsing our product will have millions getting our high interest card." Many times this works on some people. (Think Oprah endorsed stuff) So let's say Ed and John have a slight difference in a political issue such as, Ed thinks that yellow lights on traffic lights should be done away with , just read and green (Merry Christmas) , John thinks that yellow should stay. Although this difference ( that would be a great hot-button issue) could affect John giving Ed a much needed endorsement they find a common agreement : They both want traffic lights. Unlike the other candidate in the party running against John who thinks traffic lights need to go. ( Maybe he had to many tickets?) In my what if campaign there's not much I would change on that.
By Mark T , guest writing for Croglog
email us mychiller@inbox.com
The Political Season , has it's conventions and the debates are about to start we've had this long period of candidates attacking and promising. We suffer under the political ads that torture on TV, Radio and internet. We make the joke that politicians lie , and that they probably do.
What if a politician ran a campaign differently ? How ? You may be asking. Many campaigns are built on promises , " When ( Very confident) I am elected president i will ....(insert something here)". 3 things usually happen if that person wins , a. they work on the promise, b, they forget about it c, they try it and it fails. Most of the time B happens the most. Let's say I would do it more like this "When you elect me your President I will work hard on trying to get ... (insert something here) , it may not happen but there's nothing wrong with trying." It's the truth that sometimes a promise by a president can fall short, yet still showing positivity for something that may not happen.
Campaigns get dirty . We are used to these attack ads on TV where the deep voice says for example " This Candidate caused the great tuna disaster when they were governor of tuna ( this is just an example people) would you vote for this person because he caused thousands of people to be injured by defective cans?" Attacking the other candidate is what always happens , dig up their past try to relate it to the future. " This Governor caused his state to have a deficit think what he will do to the country" That kind of thing , trying to make you think "Hey, if he can't run a state how can he run a country?" Most cases attacks are the candidate wanting you to like them more than the other person. What they are really saying is " I told my dear mother when I was 8 , I want to be president of the United States. I should be the President" That would probably be the honest thing to say. Attacking the other candidate is really like other adverting. " Joe's Fords has more Fords at better prices than Jim's Fords". They both are selling Fords but Joe's wants you to come to them and makes Jim's not look that good. Human Emotion is what you play with. What if , campaign has not figured out away to get rid of attacks , many candidates have tried to play the positive person , but at many a time they have to go negative. But a nice way to be negative : "I might like the other candidate they seem very nice , but if they were president they might cause (insert something bad here) ." See an honest opinion but still kind of negative.
Endorse me ,would you? Let's say there was a candidate let's him Ed , he's running for President , and for now he's going through a primary in his party, then there's a former president (ooh lucky) , named John (they don't have last names) he is well loved by his party and voters in that party. That's great! So maybe Ed thinks that if he got John's endorsement it would help in his party. It's like a famous person endorsing a credit card ( since when to famous people use credit cards?). The company thinks "Hey, we got this big celebrity endorsing our product will have millions getting our high interest card." Many times this works on some people. (Think Oprah endorsed stuff) So let's say Ed and John have a slight difference in a political issue such as, Ed thinks that yellow lights on traffic lights should be done away with , just read and green (Merry Christmas) , John thinks that yellow should stay. Although this difference ( that would be a great hot-button issue) could affect John giving Ed a much needed endorsement they find a common agreement : They both want traffic lights. Unlike the other candidate in the party running against John who thinks traffic lights need to go. ( Maybe he had to many tickets?) In my what if campaign there's not much I would change on that.
Labels:
Choice2012,
Opinion,
politics
Tuesday, April 03, 2012
The Delegate Counts as of Wednesday April 4th 2012
CHOICE 2012
Mitt Romney 648
Rick Santorum 264
Newt Gingrich 137
Ron Paul 71
Labels:
Choice2012
Sunday, March 25, 2012
The Delegate Count as of March 25th
CHOICE 2012
Mitt Romney 563
Rick Santorum 259
Newt Gingrich 137
Mitt Romney 563
Rick Santorum 259
Newt Gingrich 137
Ron Paul 71
After the Louisiana win, Rick Santourm adds 10 delegates , Romney did get 1.
As of 25March 2012
To win 1,144 delegates is needed Please note: these are estimates.
Labels:
Choice2012
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
The Delegate count as of March 21st 2012
CHOICE 2012
Mitt Romney 562
Rick Santorum 249
Newt Gingrich 137
Mitt Romney 562
Rick Santorum 249
Newt Gingrich 137
Ron Paul 71
As of 20March 2012
To win 1,144 delegates is needed Please note: these are estimates.
Labels:
Choice2012
Monday, March 12, 2012
The Delegate numbers update as of March 10th 2012
CHOICE 2012
Mitt Romney 458
Rick Santorum 203
Newt Gingrich 118
Mitt Romney 458
Rick Santorum 203
Newt Gingrich 118
Ron Paul 66
As of 10March 2012
Labels:
Choice2012
Monday, March 05, 2012
The Delegate Count before Super Tuesday 2012
CHOICE 2012
Mitt Romney 207
Rick Santorum 86
Ron Paul 46
Mitt Romney 207
Rick Santorum 86
Ron Paul 46
Newt Gingrich 39
As of 4March 2012
As of 4March 2012
Ron Paul has moved up ,to 3rd.
Labels:
Choice2012
The Great Predictor :Super Tuesday Edition
SUPER TUESDAY
By Kathy Walker for mychiler
The voters , of course always have a say in elections , and Media pundits are always trying make up who they think they will win by thinking how people will think when voting . I made predictions during the election (MI and Az Primaries ) that were right, just by guessing and not using polls and thinking on how people are thinking about thinking for who they will vote for.
Alaska , that big land mass in the north , west of Canada. I Think will go for Dr. Ron Paul (R-TX),The next state, Georgia , this is Newt Gingrich's home state , I think he will win since that's where he is from. Massachusetts, another Mitt Romney home state, so it should go for him, I know it wouldn't be Newt because he kept calling Mitt Romney a Massachusetts Liberal or Moderate. Oklahoma , the state, not the play, will go to Mitt Romney not Sanoturm ... I am going on a limb against the media pundits here. North Dakota , I say will go for Santorum here. Idaho I think can also go to Ron Paul. Tennessee , I will say goes for RIck Santorum. Vermont, is Mitt Romney's area , so I say it goes to him. Virginia is a special case, since Santorum and Gingrich aren't on the ballot so I say it goes to Romney. I'll give the other big price, Ohio, to Romney.
see you on Super Tuesday.
Labels:
Choice2012,
supertuesday2012
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Choice 2012: The Delegate count so far as of 2/29/12
CHOICE 2012
Mitt Romney 171
Rick Santorum 52
Newt Gingrich 38
Ron Paul 27
changes: Rick Santorum takes 2nd place from Newt Gingrich.
related : The 2012 primary/Caucus calendar
Mitt Romney 171
Rick Santorum 52
Newt Gingrich 38
Ron Paul 27
changes: Rick Santorum takes 2nd place from Newt Gingrich.
related : The 2012 primary/Caucus calendar
Labels:
Choice2012
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
[LIVE BLOG] Arizona and Michigan Primaries
Choice 2012
Arizona : 29 delegates (proportional)
Michigan : 30 delegates (proportional)
LIVE BLOG
Labels:
Choice2012,
live blogs
Sunday, February 26, 2012
THE OP-ED heard and history around it [Opinion and Review]
Opinion | Guest Commentary
By Matthew K writing for Mychiller
In 2008 Mitt Romney wrote an op-ed for the New York Times , about the auto companies,the American auto-makers who were begging for a bail-out at the time. This happened too:
From CNN :
From the New York Times :
From ABC NEWS , also on December 11th 2008.
By Matthew K writing for Mychiller
In 2008 Mitt Romney wrote an op-ed for the New York Times , about the auto companies,the American auto-makers who were begging for a bail-out at the time. This happened too:
From CNN :
Some lawmakers lashed out at the CEOs of the Big Three auto companies Wednesday for flying private jets to Washington to request taxpayer bailout money.That was Novemember 19th 2008 when that article came out.
From the New York Times :
The Senate on Thursday night abandoned efforts to fashion a government rescue of the American automobile industry, as Senate Republicans refused to support a bill endorsed by the White House and Congressional Democrats.That was December 11th 2008.
From ABC NEWS , also on December 11th 2008.
Even if TARP funds are made available to the Big Three, would that save the automakers from bankruptcy, or just delay it?As yes what a good question if GM and Chrysler got the TARP bail out, would that delay it ? T.A.R.P , if you forgot what it was , was the bank bailouts of 2008 under President Bush. It cost $787 billion dollars of Tax-payer money.
Labels:
Choice2012,
Opinion,
politics
Saturday, February 25, 2012
To Michigan , Arizona our prdictions and notes
Politics Choice 2012
By Skyler M and Kathy Walker
Here comes Michigan and Arizona's primaries... it's big chance for the first big primaries since Florida, last month and the last until Super Tuesday, the week later. Mitt Romney , if he wants to become the media front runner again he has to win both or just Michigan to get his momentum and status back. Former senator Rick Santorum , has been on a roll since he won , Missouri, Minnesota,and Colorado he has been very covered in this month. Newt Gingrich , who is not leading well in these two states has been focused on Super Tuesday states that happen on March 6th. Ron Paul who hasn't won a state, unless you count Maine as fraudulent results that cheated him, he hasn't won a state.
February 28th
Primary Arizona 29 Delegates at stake (Proportional)
Michigan 30 Delegates at stake (Proportional)
Michigan is considered a home state for Mr.Romney his father was governor there from 1963-1969 , and President of the now defunct American Motors Corporation. But recent polls show it close or Romney leading by a couple points it wasn't like that before but it's like that now. Romney is leading in Arizona by 13 points .
Kathy's Predictions : Michigan will go to Mitt Romney but it won't be pretty ...Arizona will too a good night for him but a squeaker non the less. Second will be Santorum and 3rd wiil be Ron Paul .
Skyler's Outlook: No one will be quitting after that's pretty much known but it's a moral boaster for anyone who wins these races.
Delegate count as fof 2/25/12
ROMNEY 127
Gingrich 38
Santorum 37
Paul 27
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
[OPINION] Maybe the Republicans don't want to win
OPINION
By Robert E writing for mychiller
Poor Mitt Romney. He lost 2008 after really really wanting to win he then worked from 2009 to try again building up a money support and everything else. He was called a great conservative by many Republican top people and everyone who was mad about John McCain losing 2008 election. To Mr. McCain's defense it wasn't his fault , now President Obama had a stronger base and there was an anti-republican mood after President Bush. Many conservatives are looking for one of their own to run this time, and Romney is not their own.
They beckoned to Mitt Daniels or Chris Christie (They are NOT going to RUN and I am not surprised).They then test tried the Michelle Bachmann she ran great from the start, but like Newt Gingrich they found another, Rick Perry. He was the conservative dream until some debates where he failed so all aboard the "Cain-Train" cost 9-9-9. They went to Gingrich , and now Rick Santorum. They forget Ron Paul , who if anything is the only true conservative. True Conservatives who care about fiscal issues don't want to go to war with everyone they don't like. But get back to what I am saying this shopping spree is not kind of showing me something... they don't want to win the White House.
NO, I am not trying to say they should go to Romney if they know what's best for them. I am really saying that they don't wanna win the White House. Maybe they wanna keep the house and get the senate under the control. In 2016 , if Obama is a second term, it's an open-election and that would be best. Is that their secret thought? They can't trust Mitt Romney , Newt Gingrich and Rick Santourm scare people ( I am not a liberal if you are thinking I am) . Ron Paul is denounced by the conservatives because they think he's an isolationist, for note isolationism means you don't want to be bothered with rest of the world at all. Dr. Paul is a non-interventionist , he wants to trade with other countries but not blow them up because they gave you a fun look.
Labels:
Choice2012,
Opinion
Saturday, February 11, 2012
The Maine Caucuses and Stat Borad
Maine Delegates 24 total: 21 caucus -related , 3 unpleged
[update 6:26PMET]
MItt Romney wins Maine
Mitt Romney 2,190 39%
Ron Paul 1,996 36%
Rick Santorum 989 18%
Newt Gingrich 349 6
UP NEXT
Arizona, Michigan February 28th
[the full calendar ->>> }
Labels:
Choice2012
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
THE Gop change over [Opinion]
Opinion
By Carl Johnson for mychiller
Former Penn. Senator Rick Santorum won in 3 states last night , now the news media has made the story more about Romney not winning , but I am going to take this my way. Newt Gingrich lost more this is something , the fight has been who has more clout to beat Mitt Romney in the GOP. Mr. Gingrich has been saying it was him , who could do it and debate the current president, he used every debate for his advance. (OK, not the last two Florida debates). The question for Newt is , he really the person people want to be a nominee or the president? "Likability polls" show that Newt is not well liked by a lot of people ,Mitt Romney is not liked by conservatives , but is liked by moderates (kind of) , Ron Paul is the only other candidate with a high favorable number.
Newt Gingrich , I know his campaign was considered dead 3 times already,but when he gets ahead he screws up (pardon my ways) , and with that he can say will run through August , but he doesn't have the power too if he doesn't win alot. He will be going to Tampa ... for a visit to the convention but not to cause trouble ... if he cares about his party and no matter who wins his party's nomination.
I do think there maybe one more Mr.Gingrich surge it depends on how he acts for how it to go. Mitt Romney also needs to humanize himself and try to be himself . Play offense with his rivals not defense .
By Carl Johnson for mychiller
Former Penn. Senator Rick Santorum won in 3 states last night , now the news media has made the story more about Romney not winning , but I am going to take this my way. Newt Gingrich lost more this is something , the fight has been who has more clout to beat Mitt Romney in the GOP. Mr. Gingrich has been saying it was him , who could do it and debate the current president, he used every debate for his advance. (OK, not the last two Florida debates). The question for Newt is , he really the person people want to be a nominee or the president? "Likability polls" show that Newt is not well liked by a lot of people ,Mitt Romney is not liked by conservatives , but is liked by moderates (kind of) , Ron Paul is the only other candidate with a high favorable number.
Newt Gingrich , I know his campaign was considered dead 3 times already,but when he gets ahead he screws up (pardon my ways) , and with that he can say will run through August , but he doesn't have the power too if he doesn't win alot. He will be going to Tampa ... for a visit to the convention but not to cause trouble ... if he cares about his party and no matter who wins his party's nomination.
I do think there maybe one more Mr.Gingrich surge it depends on how he acts for how it to go. Mitt Romney also needs to humanize himself and try to be himself . Play offense with his rivals not defense .
Labels:
Choice2012,
Opinion
Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Colorado, Minnesota Caucus and Missouri Primary.
Update by Kathy Walker of mychiller [10:33pm ET]
Rick Santourum wins Missouri, and MIssouri
These are non-binding races for now. But means something anyway.
Rick Santourum wins Missouri, and MIssouri
Choice 2012 the Delegates as of 2/6/2012
99
33
15
11
source: CNN
Delegates at stake by state tonight.
COLORADO 36 Minnesota 40 Missouri 52
all states are proportional
These are non-binding races for now. But means something anyway.
Labels:
Choice2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)